<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="0.92"><channel><title>Water-carrier</title><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/</link><description></description><language>en-EU</language><docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs><item><title>In response to:Internet Affair</title><description>A sense of impossible love - wirreles eyes. I like it. I'll pop here more often, so so :)</description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/03/01/internet-affair-3800943/#c7371180</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:17:21 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Internet Affair</title><description>...just keep writing and trying&lt;br&gt;
to stop you know what. :o)&lt;br&gt;
</description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/03/01/internet-affair-3800943/#c6381478</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:40:59 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Internet Affair</title><description>And you succeed! :yes:</description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/03/01/internet-affair-3800943/#c6196267</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 20:16:02 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Internet Affair</title><description>Thanks Marian!&lt;br&gt;
I try, I try...</description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/03/01/internet-affair-3800943/#c6196097</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 19:53:53 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Internet Affair</title><description>Excellent!</description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/03/01/internet-affair-3800943/#c6195500</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 18:29:53 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Internet Affair</title><description>Thank you dear..!&lt;br&gt;
Happy adventures in Blog.uk. </description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/03/01/internet-affair-3800943/#c6193499</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 13:00:54 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Internet Affair</title><description>That's really beautiful!</description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/03/01/internet-affair-3800943/#c6193434</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:50:19 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Dreamer</title><description>Nice. Thank you. . .</description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/02/22/dreamer~3765796/#c6138195</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:45:12 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Dreamer</title><description>The Dreamer's object of appreciation, may very well fit to the ohlala I know. In other words yes!</description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/02/22/dreamer~3765796/#c6134637</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:44:14 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Dreamer</title><description>It looks like this wonderful poem is dedicated to a person like me. . .</description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/02/22/dreamer~3765796/#c6130954</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:31:15 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Sweet and sour</title><description>The "I burn my fuel" thing is not so poetic. I need to do sth with it. The main reason I keep the blog running is to feel the obligation to write. Not that I don't enjoy writing. It evens many balances. </description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/02/15/sweet_and_sour~3730567/#c6070650</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:02:30 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:I wish...</title><description>As you please. &lt;br&gt;
Most post offices have IRCs. In Ambit they don't seem like pirates. At least they had the decency replying to me that they have received my submitted poems and stories. I'm now sitting on my eggs awaiting the verdict if they will publish me. As far as I can tell, the magazine is spotted by agents and relevant fruit.I don't promote the magazine. Just gave a tip. We have a saying in Greece that the one who is drowning grab their hair to save themselves.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I'll send you a story right now.</description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/01/01/i_wish~3514422/#c6070428</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:32:58 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Sweet and sour</title><description>I love "in the heat of melting glass", "in your eyes I sail in love",&lt;br&gt;
and "you’re my candle I’m your dove" sounds like a refrain of a good song.&lt;br&gt;
</description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/02/15/sweet_and_sour~3730567/#c6070206</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:43:58 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:I wish...</title><description>They at Ambit require a self-addressed envelope with UK stamps enclosed, or endorsed International Reply Coupons (IRCs)--I have neither, so it doesn’t suit me. </description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/01/01/i_wish~3514422/#c6070150</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:31:01 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:I wish...</title><description>Ah, you mean the e-mail address!&lt;br&gt;
Yes, I've checked on ambit magazine, but I have to think that over.&lt;br&gt;
</description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/01/01/i_wish~3514422/#c6069742</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 04:41:53 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:I wish...</title><description>Your latter reply... Now I have no clue what you are talking about.What you should have known better? </description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/01/01/i_wish~3514422/#c6069740</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 04:37:03 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:I wish...</title><description>I checked your profile to the page bottom.&lt;br&gt;
I should have known better...</description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/01/01/i_wish~3514422/#c6069688</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:13:15 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:I wish...</title><description>Shoot me, pinch me, kick me, poke my eye, I have no clue what you're talking about. I thought tags are innocent marks for domestic blog use. Now you tell me "if I get it right" that in case I'm interested in poetry blogs I can find them via tags. Fine. Had left everything to chance same way I found you. Beg you to tell me how it's done.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Did you check on ambit magazine ?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The dead man story just killed me. The ending though brought me back to earth which I wouldn't prefer. Bad boy am I to criticize.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Didn't check if there's an e-mail in your profile. I write stories too. Have translated some but my English ain't good as yours. Send me your e-mail and we exchange stories to compare dicks...ha...ha...ha..! </description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/01/01/i_wish~3514422/#c6069685</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:01:44 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:I wish...</title><description>You have to tag your wonderful poems--the more tags, the more people will find and read them. You don't do it. Why?</description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/01/01/i_wish~3514422/#c6069383</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:05:03 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Angel</title><description>Indeed..!</description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/01/06/angel~3537385/#c5719840</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:39:51 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Angel</title><description>many aspects indeed. life, and people, are so interesting.</description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/01/06/angel~3537385/#c5719557</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 08:08:55 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Angel</title><description>You're right..!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
PS. Though, allow me to show you a different angle of erotic love prematurely lost. In one of my poems written in Greek, the guy's girlfriend passed away while they were deeply in love. The guy was haunted by his love lost, so he couldn't function normally ever after. The women he was involved with later on, understood he didn't really love them and they were leaving him, for the guy to result thinking that the original girl should not die, just because they missed the chance to see their love faint away, hate each other and finally carry on with their lives as if nothing had happened.&lt;br&gt;
So many aspects of a single situation, we need many lifetimes to experience all.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks for dropping by.&lt;br&gt;
Cheers..!&lt;br&gt;
</description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/01/06/angel~3537385/#c5717681</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:44:54 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Angel</title><description>That's very, very beautiful.&lt;br&gt;
love does live forever. "To live in the hearts of those we leave behind is not to die"&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
</description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/01/06/angel~3537385/#c5710205</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:04:40 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:I wish...</title><description>...wishing you all that makes you&lt;br&gt;
happy from here to there!</description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2008/01/01/i_wish~3514422/#c5620329</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 21:08:09 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:On earth.</title><description>A tone of optimism, to favor the religious period.&lt;br&gt;
By the way, Mr Dickens wrote the best fairy-tale I've ever read,&lt;br&gt;
together with Hawk Finn. But since I'm no more a child, Scrooge  is keener to me such days. &lt;br&gt;
  </description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2007/12/24/on_earth~3486481/#c5562718</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 17:34:29 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:On earth.</title><description>Sir,&lt;br&gt;
Quite adorable! </description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2007/12/24/on_earth~3486481/#c5562075</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 15:52:10 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Somebody else</title><description>Thank you Marian. &lt;br&gt;
I'd add understandable too, cause my writing resembles Picasso's&lt;br&gt;
paintings. You need to have a sickish imagination to assume me.&lt;br&gt;
Cheers..!  &lt;br&gt;
  </description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2007/12/16/somebody_else~3451464/#c5498245</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:10:36 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Somebody else</title><description>That's beautiful :yes: sad but nevertheless beautiful :yes:</description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2007/12/16/somebody_else~3451464/#c5495932</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:43:09 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:I wish</title><description>Hi, you're right about the peace thing. &lt;br&gt;
The peace of mind after the relevant fights which of course&lt;br&gt;
use metaphorical weapons. </description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2007/12/10/i_wish~3422488/#c5461670</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:14:20 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:I wish</title><description>Hi, fighting is the way to go, it can lead to peace. </description><link>http://watercarrier.blog.co.uk/2007/12/10/i_wish~3422488/#c5447969</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:18:14 +0100</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
